More Website Templates @ TemplateMonster.com. November19, 2012!
  • Modigovt did ideal thing by legitimizing online 'markets',

    9 comments

    The NarendraModi federal government s choice to permit 100 percent foreign direct investment (FDI) in online marketplace retailing, subject to some riders, is the right one for India.

    What this implies is that the future of Indian e-commerce will basically be foreign ownership, given that few Indian business groups have the deep pockets needed to sustain such low-margin and unpredictable client bases over continual amount of times.
    When client loyalties can switch the minute they get a better deal in other places, you require lots of capital infusions at regular periods to sustain a business model.

    It is worth keeping in mind that Flipkart`s continuing losses after scaling up its volumes is over Rs 2,000 crore (2014-15), and the leading three e-tailers (Amazon India and Snapdeal, plus Flipkart) managed to collectively lose over Rs 5,000 crore in 2014.

    The government s choice has actually been triggered by four elements.
    # 1: Online commerce has actually seen a large inflow of FDI already. It makes no sense to shoo this away when the investment can create thousands of jobs in innovation, warehousing, sales, logistics, etc.

    # 2: Online marketplaces had no earlier legality, and it did not make good sense to continue with this ambiguity when billions of dollars were currently committed. Digital India will be bankrolled by online selling in substantial measure by building business models for it.

    # 3: Offline sellers like Kishore Biyani (Big Bazaar) were crying foul, stating online retailers like Flipkart were providing deep discount rates even below cost to destroy their companies. They wanted a level playing field.

    # 4: Most crucial, online retailing cannot be sustained by low capital. Providing complimentary play to FDI was inevitable.

    It deserves taking a look at the big dangers being courted by online marketplaces in attempting to construct their companies. In February, Flipkart, which was earlier valued at over $15 billion, saw its assessment plunge 25 percent to $11 billion, as financiers saw that it might take longer to make a profit. Globally, other tech items have actually also seen such value disintegrations due to sluggish earnings growth or new competitive threats. According to this Economic Times report, file-sharing platform Dropbox s assessment has dropped 50 percent, Snapchat`s by 25 percent and Palantir`s by 32 percent.
    Even Amazon hardly earns a profit internationally, as founder Jeff Bezos believes that he needs to keep investing profits to build a client experience that will sustain profits in future. And remember, Amazon started life in 1995.

    Coming to the federal government`s e-commerce choice allowing 100 percent FDI, exactly what it has actually essentially done is to approve legitimacy to what is called the marketplace model, where the company declares to be an innovation platform to help with direct interaction between sellers and buyers online. Prior to this explanation, the likes of Flipkart were essentially operating in quasi-legal territory, as no rule permitted foreign investment in e-commerce.

    Worse, the online merchants were using the ruse of marketplace to provide deep direct discounts on products to customers, often below expense, by dipping into their personal equity-funded corpuses, taking clients far from brick-and-mortar retailers. The federal government s choice tries to level the field.
    These conditions forbid online marketplaces from offering more than 25 percent of their items through one supplier, and likewise prohibit them from holding stocks of their own for direct sales to clients. Flipkart utilizes WS Retail and Amazon India Cloudtail India to create more than 25 percent of their earnings, according to a Mint story today (30 March).

    The NDA move, while relieving offline sellers, will, however, face political reaction just as the UPA decision to enable 51 percent investment in multi-brand retail. That choice caused a rupture with Mamata Banerjee stopping the federal government in 2013, and many states banning multi-brand retail. By allowing 100 percent FDI in e-commerce, the NDA might be opening another can of worms for itself.
    It is the right decision, for online markets are the future of e-commerce, and without strong financing, not possible in the Indian context for most company groups they cannot sustain long periods of losses in order to build a large sufficient consumer base that will sustain.

    The rise of innovation companies in the post-1990s period has revealed the power of interruption in routine offline business models. Entire companies from airline companies, rail and bus ticketing to media to advertising to retailing to even taxi services have actually been affected by technology platforms that offer better options at the click of a button.

    We have actually moved to the age of the platform, as author Phil Simon says in a book with the same title. Innovation business has to construct platforms on which other companies and vendors can sell or promote their items for which the platform carrier can charge a cost or toll. Building a platform is not a one-time effort; it is about constantly investing in constructing more and more products into the platform, so that everyone can jump on to it.